US sanctions on Huawei could impact firm’s role in UK 5G, ministers suggest

Ministers have suggested that new U.S. sanctions against Huawei could force the company to rethink its role in the UK's 5G network.

In May, the Trump administration tightened sanctions against the technology giant for fear of close ties with the Chinese state.

Stricter rules for Huawei's ability to buy semiconductor chips from companies using US technology to manufacture them have prompted the UK's National Cyber ​​Security Center (NCSC) to conduct a review to assess the potential impact on UK networks evaluate.

Digital Secretary Oliver Dowden told MPs the new review is needed to determine Huawei's "reliability" and viability for the future within the UK's infrastructure in the face of such constraints.

"Given that the U.S. government has imposed sanctions on Huawei because it focuses on 5G, we need to fully understand them and understand how this affects how much we can rely on Huawei devices in the system if it is subject to these restrictions on sanctions, ”he said.

Mr Dowden wants the competitive environment to become more diverse so that the UK is not dependent on a limited number of companies – currently only Huawei, Nokia and Siemens are leaders in 5G technology.

He added that the government was seeking to remove Huawei from the network "over time" – but declined to set a timeline for such a move.

An earlier review prior to the introduction of stricter sanctions found that Huawei can play a smaller role in the UK's 5G infrastructure.

However, the company was classified as a "high-risk provider", excluded from sensitive parts of the network, and was advised that it would be limited to no more than 35% of the network's non-core areas.

Defense Secretary Ben Wallace, who also attended the hearing, denied proposals that the US would bully Britain to take harsher measures against Huawei.

"It is not an American sanction against us, it is an American sanction against the use of American intellectual property (intellectual property) – not British intellectual property – that appears to make some of the Huawei devices inoperable. So the United States can completely sanction whoever they want, "he told the Defense Committee.

Ben Wallace "Data Title =" Ben Wallace "Data Copyright Holder =" PA Wire "Data Copyright Notice =" PA Wire / PA Images "Data Credit =" Aaron Chown "Data Terms of Use =" "srcset =" https: / / 7a08d035a0dcfad123263af750d3b672Y29udGVudHNlYXJjaCwxNTkzNjIxNDEx / 2.51273212.jpg w = 640 640W, 1280W "size =" (max-width: 767px)? 89vw, (maximum width: 1000px) 54vw, (maximum width: 1071px) 543px, 580px "/>
<figcaption>Defense Secretary Ben Wallace spoke with Digital Secretary Oliver Dowden on evidence taking with the Defense Committee (Aaron Chown / PA).</figcaption></figure>
<p>"If British intellectual property were sanctioned by a third country, you could say you are being bullied or pressured, but to my knowledge, it is not about chip makers and things that come from Taiwan with US intellectual property, and we would be ours Enforce view – and we still do – on intellectual property that we own, so I don't think it's bullying in the United States. "</p>
<p>The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has officially classified Huawei as a national threat.</p>
<p>After Tuesday’s meeting, Huawei’s Vice President Victor Zhang said: “We’re investing billions to make the Prime Minister’s vision of a“ connected kingdom ”a reality, so that British families and businesses everywhere have access to fast, reliable mobile and broadband networks did you live.</p>
<p>"We have been in the UK for 20 years and continue to focus on working with our customers and the government to ensure that the country receives the jobs created by 5G and economic growth as quickly as possible."</p>
<p><br />
<br /><a href=Source link

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.